Julius Caesar Group Project

Julius Caesar Group Project Analyzing verbiage on Marc Antonys Speech 1. overall I would classify Marc Antonys spoken language as largely monosyllabic as a whole in length. This took a much longer time to limit than it did of Brutus expression, this could be that Antony is a smarter and nobler person or that its just how Julius Caesar constructed the linguistic communication to stockpile the crowd. whizz of the dividing lines that demonstrate a non bad(p) go for of one and only(a) syllable would be My inwardness is in the coffin there with Caesar and I must pause till it do back to me (Shakespe atomic number 18, problems 108-109).This is just one of the numerous lines that uses a lot of one syllable wrangle but in the shutting the speech was mainly one syllable in length. 2. Antonys speech uses a really thoroughly use of both techniques of persuading and informing. I felt up that there was more(prenominal) use of persuading in his speech than informing but thats only because they love Antony at the end of the speech. An example of informing from Antony is, I convey to bury Caesar non praise him (Shakespeare, Line 2) Here he is just revealing the earshot and conspirators that he is just nerve-racking to give a simple Funeral.Antony is ingenious with his formulates by bluntly verbal expression things and letting the audiences genius go off and feel that things are correct. Its non just the interview that persuades themselves he says, Did this in Caesar seem aspiring(prenominal)? (Shakespeare, Line 92). Giving examples and then inquire questions to play with their minds was a very undefeated tactic of Antonys. 3. I felt that Antonys diction was very baronial in his speech un same(p) Brutus the crowd does not respond in his speech.Antony uses advance intelligence activity choice, which makes him look more intelligent to the not so intelligent clump of Romans. An exquisite example of his formal diction would be, So let it be w ith Caesar. The Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was aspirant if it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar sufficed it (Shakespeare, lines 79-82) the linguistic communication such as grievous and ambitious show formal diction. Diction like Antonys turns Brutus speech with repititon which makes their mind conceptualize that WOWThis very is impressive and hes right although he does ruination minuscule with not letting the audience get in some serve of their own opinion. 4. Antony is very wise and really gets people in his speech in Act 3 Scene 2 by using denotative examples and not what if and in general meanings. He not only gives specific examples on how things should be but also on how things shouldnt be which is genius like of Antony to impersonate pros and cons. Lines 90 and 91 re blameless examples of specifics he tells us, He hath brought mevery captives stand to Tome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. (Shakespeare, Line 90-91) Anto ny uses long examples but this one stuck out to me most. 5. leaving back to specifics, my feelings brace not changed, Antony is contaminating with specifics that make his speech concrete. Another one of his detailed specific would be from line 93 where he states, When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept (Shakespeare, Line 93).Not only is this fact unwarranted one but also it involves condolence and makes Caesar look even better 6. One of Antonys tactics also for his great speech was the euphonious bill/ word choice he used. Typically when you use a nice/pleasant tone with people, they will give you what you want. One of the more highlighting parts of the euphonious voice communication was in line 89 where he declares, And Brutus is an honourable man. . Even though Antony disagreed very highly of Brutus and the conspirators he still followed the ascertain Brutus gave him and used very appreciative words with the crowd. . According to Marc Antonys diction I do feel that h e does hit his overall purpose for the crowd to like him, honor Caesar, and strongly hate Brutus and the conspirators. He succeeds this overall purpose by creation clever and tricky with his words by speaking against Brutus he falls short by not using as much emotion. The greater part of his speech was most definitely greater than any other part of his speech.